|
|
Discovering the secret
For most of human history we didn’t know why
offspring looked like their parents. It took a monk working in a garden
of peas to discover the truth. This began the first wave of genetic discoveries.
 |
 |
 |
 |
1909 A new word
 |
 |
Wilhelm Johannsen, a Danish botanist,
coined the term "gene" from the Greek word meaning "to be
born." His word replaced the term "factors," which Mendel
had suggested were involved in passing on traits. Genes now
had a name, but no one knew what they were or how they worked.
|
1911 Genes on chromosomes
 |
 |
Since
the 1880s scientists had observed threadlike structures in
a cell's nucleus; they named those structures "chromosomes."
In 1902, Walter Sutton, a graduate student at Columbia University,
suggested that chromosomes contained genes. Thomas Hunt Morgan,
also at Columbia, proved him right in 1911. Working with fruit
flies, he and his students found that genes seemed to be fixed
in place along chromosomes. They were indeed the units of
heredity.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
1952 Genes are DNA
 |
 |
Viruses
infect bacteria by injecting their genes. Alfred Hershey and
Martha Chase at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory wanted to know
if those genes were protein or DNA. In a simple experiment
involving a kitchen blender, they discovered that viruses
inject bacteria with DNA, not protein. Back in 1943 Avery
had been right. Genes are DNA.
|
1953 "We found the secret of life." Francis Crick
 |
 |
What
is DNA and how does it work? The answer to that question came
from American biologist James Watson and British physicist
Francis Crick, both at Cambridge University in England. Building
"tinkertoy®" models largely based on the research of other
scientists, they discovered DNA's shape-a double helix. From
the two-stranded shape they also saw how it worked. Each strand
served as a mold or template for reproducing itself. This
has been called the most important biological discovery of
the 20th century. In 1962 Watson and Crick, with fellow researcher
Maurice Wilkins, won the Nobel Prize. |
Cracking the code
 |
 |
Discovering
DNA's double helix was an amazing breakthrough, but it created
many questions. What do all those DNA letters mean? What's
the code? How do recipes in the nucleus travel to protein
factories outside the nucleus? How does the protein-making
process work? The next wave of discovery resulted in cracking
the code of life's genetic recipe.
|
1957 A missing link?
 |
 |
DNA wasn't
the only molecule involved in the making of proteins. RNA,
a chemical cousin to DNA, was a part of the mix, too. That
was discovered by Elliot Volkin and Lazarus Astrachan, working
at what's now the Oak Ridge National Laboratories in Tennessee.
To everyone's surprise, it seemed that RNA, not DNA, controlled
translating genetic recipes into proteins.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
1973 Genetic factories

Herbert Boyer |
 |
Can you
cut a gene out of one species and paste it into another? That's
what Stanley Cohen and Herbert Boyer, at the University of
California at San Francisco, did-they snipped out a virus
gene and pasted it into bacteria. When the bacteria reproduced,
they made copies of the virus gene. The researchers showed
that bacteria could be made into protein-producing factories.
By recombining genes in this way, Cohen and Boyer founded
"recombinant" DNA technology.
|
1975 Speedy sequencing
 |
 |
Scientists
were able to read the order, or sequence, of millions of DNA
letters, but only one by one. That tough, time-consuming work
got a lot easier when Fred Sanger, at Cambridge University,
developed the first fast "sequencing" method-called the chain
termination method. In 1980 Sanger won the Nobel Prize for
his invention, along with Walter Gilbert, of Harvard University,
who invented another sequencing process. Sanger's method is
the basis for today's automated DNA sequencing technology.
|
1977 "Junk" DNA
 |
 |
For decades, scientists
thought that most of DNA contained genes and all of a gene
was a recipe for a protein. Two Americans, Phillip Sharp,
at M.I.T., and Richard Roberts, of Cal Tech shattered that
idea. They found that most DNA doesn't seem to be a recipe
for anything, and within a gene are long sections of seemingly
useless DNA. Sharp and Roberts won the Nobel Prize in 1993
for discovering this "junk" DNA.
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
1981 Gene swapping
 |
 |
If the
genes of bacteria and viruses could be recombined, why not
the genes of mammals? To better understand genes, Frank Costantini
and Elizabeth Lacy, at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratories, experimented
with injecting rabbit genes into the fertilized eggs of mice.
The resulting mice looked and acted like mice, but made rabbit
blood cells. Research with "transgenic" animals like these
offers scientists new ways to test how genes work.
|
Racing to the frontier
 |
 |
By the
1980s, geneticists were cutting, pasting and copying genes
with ease. As they deciphered genomes of several viruses and
bacteria, a radical idea emerged-why not tackle all the code
in human DNA? This wave of discovery led to one of our greatest
scientific achievements-sequencing the entire human genome.
|
1983 DNA copy machine
 |
 |
Studying
genes required vast quantities of expensive genetic material.
Biochemist Kary Mullis, at that time with Cetus Corporation
in Emeryville, California, revolutionized genetics. While
driving along the coast one evening, he dreamed up a fast
and cheap way to make lots of copies of a little bit of DNA.
His technique, called polymerase chain reaction or PCR, is
especially important in genetic testing and DNA fingerprinting.
In 1993 Mullis won the Nobel Prize for his discovery.
|
1986 Faster, faster!
 |
 |
Even
"fast" methods for sequencing genes were slow-scientists could
read only about 500 DNA letters a day. Leroy Hood and his
colleagues at Cal Tech invented the first automated sequencing
machine. It could read 15,000 or more letters a day. For the
first time scientists' grand dream of reading the entire human
genome seemed close to reality.
|
|
 |
 |
What's the next wave?
"Today is
… not the end of genomics, but perhaps it's the end of the beginning.
Together we must develop the advances in medicine that are the real
reason for doing this work. And with just as much vigor, we must
provide the protections against potential misuses of genetic information
… we must apply just as much energy and attention to solving the
ethical, legal and social issues as we do the bench research."
—Dr. Francis Collins, director of the National Human
Genome Research Institute, June 26, 2000
"Some have said to me that sequencing the human genome will diminish
humanity by taking the mystery out of life. … Nothing could be further
from the truth. The complexities and wonder of how the inanimate
chemicals that are our genetic code give rise to the imponderables
of the human spirit should keep poets and philosophers inspired
for millenniums."
—Dr. J. Craig Venter, then president of Celera Genomics,
June 26, 2000
|
|